In 1787, the Constitutional Convention was held to revise the Articles of Confederation. The delegates were deeply divided. Each delegate thought they held the plan for the best way forward. These men, our founding fathers, were ready to walk away, and let their egos get in the way of progress. But did they, no.

There were many disagreements. Disagreements over the issue of slavery, the strength of the executive branch, commerce, equal representation, and state vs. federal powers. But to the surprise of many there was what they called the “Great Compromise.” They debated, they screamed and yelled from the top of their lungs. However, in the end, the greatest Constitution in the world was penned.

Now, I am in no way comparing this past weekend’s ND GOP Convention to the Constitutional Convention. I am just using it as an example to prove, just because there is division, just because there is debate, and just because there may be a little yelling and screaming doesn’t mean the ND Republican party is in any trouble or imploding on itself.

Every great moment in U.S. Political history has had division and disagreements. From the Revolutionary War and the Constitutional Convention to the Civil War and the Civil Rights Movement, significant turning events and accomplishments in American history have been accompanied by fierce debates. Opposing perspectives on the function of government, rights, and equality, all essential components of American political development, often give birth to these divisions.

We see it still today in politics. We saw it at this past weekend’s NDGOP Convention, and it’s ok that it happened. It is healthy to have disagreements and debate. If everyone agreed on everything all of the time, that’s when we should be worried. A fundamental component of democracy is the existence of an opposition. When all politicians or delegates agree, it frequently indicates a lack of pluralism, which means that different points of view are not being represented. This might be a sign of an authoritarian trend. As a watchdog, an opposition party examines laws and holds the government responsible. There are no obstacles for the ruling power when there is no dispute, which results in less accountability and openness.

The 2026 NDGOP Convention was a well-attended, enjoyable experience, and complete success. When I read some of the articles, I mean opinion pieces, it makes me think of an old adage, “Those that can, do. Those that can’t, criticize”. It’s easier to pass judgement on those that have the guts and heart to step forward and try to make change, than to join those that are willing to step up and use their talents to actually fight to make change.

Because the American experiment is structured as a government by public opinion, where the popular will is supposed to be the source of all authority, the “voice of the people” is frequently seen as the ultimate weapon. Through democratic processes like elections, protests, and public discourse, this principle enables citizens to hold their government responsible, serving as a check on authority and directing policy.