They’re asking wrong questions in Epstein case
Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself. Or maybe he did. Who knows. Either way, you’re asking the wrong question.
Even Dan Bongino, a former Secret Service agent and longtime Epstein conspiracy evangelist, recently turned FBI deputy director, now sounds tired of addressing whether, in 2019, the American financier and notorious child sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, really did himself in while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. “He’s the only person in there and the only person coming out,” Bongino told Fox News a few days ago.
Sure, except for the conveniently broken cameras, missing footage and the fact that not one working lens in that New York City jail captured Epstein’s cell door, according to the Department of Justice Inspector General’s report from 2023.
I can hear the gasps already. If someone else somehow did him in, then it would prove that someone powerful didn’t ever want him to talk. And that would provide a clue as to their identity. Maybe. But also, so what?
We already know plenty. Epstein’s convicted co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell is the daughter of Robert Maxwell: the British media tycoon and owner of the Mirror Group newspapers, who “accidentally” launched himself off his yacht near Spain’s Canary Islands in 1991. British intelligence had long suspected him of playing footsie under the table with Mossad, Israel’s foreign spy service, according to Britain’s Daily Telegraph. His widow told Vanity Fair in the year after his death that all his perceived enthusiasm for Israel was just a branding ploy to score Manhattan business cred. Still, he was buried in Jerusalem. Did he need the business posthumously?
If compromising was the family business, then Maxwell’s daughter and Epstein scaled it like a global luxury empire.
Epstein wasn’t just an abuser with a Rolodex. It sounds like he was a walking honeypot operation. But for whom or what?
He met with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak “dozens of times,” including flights on the infamous jet between 2013 and 2017, according to the Times of Israel. Their little tech startup project? It’s now thriving in the U.S. And it just so happened to be founded by alums of Israel’s Unit 8200 and top defense and political officials.
That’s the part no one wants to touch: how many of these honeypot-linked ventures, dripping with foreign intel DNA, have found a comfy home in America’s digital and political bloodstream? How many are digital panopticons serving foreign interests?
There’s one influencer that everyone pretends not to notice.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio just announced visa bans for foreign officials who censor their citizens’ free speech. How noble. Unless, of course, that speech happens to be exercised about Israel, in which case you might find yourself deported from the U.S., mid-degree, just like the Tufts University Fulbright scholar who co-wrote an op-ed about Gaza. Apparently, articulating what much of the world is now saying is grounds for deportation.
Wonder if anyone watching at home has asked themselves, “Geez, what do they have on that guy?” Another question might be, what do they have on you, as a result of politicians being afraid to speak up?
Epstein may be long gone, and real questions remain. But they should focus on who benefited from his activities. Following this unbeaten path doesn’t lead to a jail cell in New York, but rather to boardrooms, tech startups and intelligence outposts operating comfortably under the radar with apparent impunity.