Think you actually own your so-called “private” property? Better know its history going back to the Ice Age, if a new landmark ruling is any indication.

A Native American tribe in Canada has just succeeded in convincing a Canadian superior court that it owns 732 acres of land on which homes, a golf course, roads and other private establishments have been built. Too bad the homeowners didn’t have an archaeological license or a crystal ball when they made their purchases, because the court explained that around 1860 — several years before Canada was even transformed from a British colony into an actual country — the governor of the area, representing the Queen of England, set aside that land for the tribe that lived only on part of it. Over the next few decades, the new Canadian government began selling off the unoccupied parts. Someone has to now pay for that slip-up. So it may as well be a bunch of folks whose great- grandparents weren’t even a zygote when all this went down.

The court has now decided that the tribe owns all the land. But they could also generously decide to allow other folks to build and live on it — if they wanted to. Cue the current homeowners’ property values plummeting, because who in their right mind would want to invest in a years-long headache while the issue remains in limbo? Homeowners have already reported that their banks are ghosting them and their mortgages like bad dates whose baggage load suddenly came crashing into view.

The next stop is the Supreme Court of Canada, where, if the ruling isn’t overturned, it risks transforming Canada into the very first communist trial run under a new globalist order. “Welcome to 2030: I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better,” wrote a former Danish environment minister on the World Economic Forum website back in 2016.

Suddenly, it doesn’t seem entirely out of the realm of possibility that homeowners could be reduced to “renting” the land from entities that might some day be considered — or transformed into — government-backed proxies, in the same way that states support and instrumentalize proxies abroad to serve their interests. Particularly when just a few years ago, new United

Nations-backed government legislation effectively resulted in tribes exercising veto power over the construction of gas pipelines critical to Canada’s economic sovereignty.

Don’t think that this could ever come to America? Consider that Common Law cases in one jurisdiction, like Canada, can influence decisions in others, including the U.S.

Now, land acknowledgments are rampant all across Canada, and growing in popularity in the U.S.