DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY

FEDERAL EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Proposed Flood Hazard Determi-

nations for Ward County, North

Dakota and Incorporated Areas

The Department of Homeland

Security’s Federal Emergency

Management Agency has issued a

preliminary Flood Insurance Rate

Map (FIRM), and where applicable,

Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report,

reflecting proposed flood hazard

determinations within Ward County,

North Dakota and Incorporated

Areas. These flood hazard determi-

nations may include the addition or

modification of Base Flood Eleva-

tions, base flood depths, Special

Flood Hazard Area boundaries or

zone designations, or the regulatory

floodway. Technical information or

comments are solicited on the pro-

posed flood hazard determinations

shown on the preliminary FIRM

and/or FIS report for Ward County,

North Dakota and Incorporated

Areas. These flood hazard determi-

nations are the basis for the flood-

plain management measures that

your community is required to either

adopt or show evidence of being al-

ready in effect in order to qualify or

remain qualified for participation in

the National Flood Insurance Pro-

gram. However, before these deter-

minations are effective for floodplain

management purposes, you will be

provided an opportunity to appeal

the proposed information. For infor-

mation on the statutory 90-day

period provided for appeals, as well

as a complete listing of the com-

munities affected and the locations

where copies of the FIRM are avail-

able for review, please visit FEMA’s

website at

www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/fhm/bfe,

or call the FEMA Mapping and In-

surance eXchange (FMIX) toll free

at 1-877-FEMA MAP

(1-877-336-2627).

(July 29; August 5, 2020)

MINOT CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING

JULY 17, 2020 AT 12:00 P.M.

Members Present: Evans, Jantzer,

Olson (phone), Pitner, Podrygula,

Ross, Sipma

Members Absent: None

Mayor Sipma presiding and led the

City Council in the Pledge of Allegi-

ance. Sipma apologized for the short

notice calling the meeting but said

he recently received the request

from the WDEA and the amicus brief

needs to be filed before the dead-

line. Acting City Manager Lakefield

explained, he was contacted by Ge-

off Simon, Executive Director of

WDEA, who is asking political sub-

divisions particularly in western

North Dakota to sign on as affected

parties in an amicus brief in support

of the Dakota Access Pipeline. The

brief is outlining additional economic

impacts and social impacts that may

be a result of shutting down the

pipeline that may not have been

considered in the Court’s decision. It

is not taking a position on the under-

lying issue of the pipeline but just

whether or not the pipeline should

be allowed to operate while the deci-

sion is taking place. Minot is im-

pacted in many ways through reve-

nues in oil production in the state,

through Hub City funding received

through oil tax revenues, funding for

many water projects and flood pro-

tection projects. In addition, there

are secondary impacts including

loss of jobs and prolonged furlough-

ing in the delay of recovery in the

energy sector and impacts from de-

creased sales tax revenues. The de-

cision before the Council is whether

they want the City of Minot to be list-

ed in this amicus brief or if they want

to stay on the sidelines. Mayor Sip-

ma referenced the refiguring of Hub

City allocations which are calculated

on the premise of oil prices at

$52-$54 per barrel. The formula

would provide Minot with an addi-

tional $3 million annually and $6 mil-

lion for the biennium to be used to-

ward oil impacted infrastructure. He

said, they need to discuss and de-

cide whether to sign on in support of

WDEA or not. Tawny Trottier Cale

approached the Council with a

greeting in a Native language. She

then said she heard there would be

a Council meeting to discuss wheth-

er or not to support the Dakota Ac-

cess Pipeline. She questioned

whether the City feels this is some-

thing they should spend time on.

She said she doesn’t think they can

separate the issues of economic and

social impacts from the pipeline it-

self. The pipeline is interwoven with

many social movements right now.

What it boils down to is the ability to

recognize the indigenous

sovereignty of the Oceti äakowi?

people, the Seven Council Fires or

the great Sioux Nation. If the

Federal Government had taken time

to recognize their sovereignty, they

would not be having this discussion.

She said, she hopes the Council

votes to show their support to Stand-

ing Rock. Mayor Sipma ack-

nowledged the emails sent to Coun-

cil in opposition and support. Evans

moved the City Council decline sup-

port of the amicus brief and remain

neutral on the issue. Motion second-

ed by Podrygula. Podrygula said,

although he agrees that pipelines

are the safest way to transport

petroleum products, he believes this

is a technical issue for the court and

is not something the City should be

involved in. He said, they have not

signed onto briefs in the past and

believes there is nothing Minot can

add to the amicus brief that has not

already been covered. Sipma rem-

inded, the amicus brief was present-

ed to them regarding whether or not

there is an impact to Minot and other

cities in western North Dakota. He

said he believes there is an impact

to Minot which is why he called the

special meeting. Minot receives Hub

City funding, there would be impacts

to sales tax revenue, and will impact

day to day as we work on revenue

projections. Jantzer also reminded

the Council to focus on what they

are being asked, which is, if the

pipeline were to shut down, would it

impact Minot? He said the answer

is, yes. Oil revenue provides funding

for water projects including flood

control. They would not be out of

line to let the court know that Minot

would be impacted by the pipeline’s

closure. Geoff Simon, Executive

Director of WDEA, elaborated on the

request. He said, other cities includ-

ing Dickinson, Williston, and Watford

City have signed on as parties to the

brief. There would be no further obli-

gation on behalf of the City of Minot.

They want to make sure the court

understands that the potential shut-

down goes far beyond the com-

panies who use it to ship crude oil.

The oil extraction and production tax

distribution formulas support the

communities through Hub City fund-

ing, the Common Schools Trust

Fund, and the Resources Trust

Fund to name a few. The concern is

that if the pipeline shuts down, so

does the restart of the industry and

there could be long term ramifica-

tions for Minot and the entire state.

Putting this crude on rail would be

far less safe and much more expen-

sive. He said a shut down would be

devastating to the state and all the

communities that depend on the in-

dustry. He then explained that the

amicus brief is being filed in support

of the motion made by the Dept of

Justice on behalf of the Corps of En-

gineers. They maintain that they did

everything properly and the environ-

mental assessment of the pipeline

and the integrity of the crossing was

quite thorough. They argue that it is

beyond the authority of the court to

shut down a project that has been

operating safely for three years. He

said, they are supporting that motion

in their brief. The stay has been

granted based upon the motion filed

by Energy Transfer, Dakota Access

but it is only there until the court de-

cides if the decision to shut down

the pipeline was warranted. After

that they will determine if an en-

vironmental impact statement is jus-

tified under the National Environ-

mental Policy Act. He said, the pri-

mary purpose of this is for the court

to understand the ripple effects that

a shut down would have. Pitner

asked if there have been any com-

munities who have not signed on or

have chosen to remain neutral in the

matter. Mr. Simon said, everyone

they have asked has agreed to sign

on including Dunn, Billings, Willi-

ams, McKenzie and Emmons coun-

ties as well as Williston, Dickinson,

Watford City. Mountrail and Morton

County’s Commission meet Mon-

day. Evans stated it is unorthodox

for a city to sign onto an amicus brief

they have not seen. She suggested

they delay approval until they have

an opportunity to review it. Mr.

Simon stated, the deadline for sub-

mission is Monday so there isn’t

much time. He said, Mr. Lakefield

has a news release from WDEA is-

suing a plea to the judge to reverse

his decision and consider the

economic ramifications of the im-

mediate and the potentially

long-term shutdown. The news

release encapsulates what will be in-

cluded in the brief. They won’t go

beyond economic and safety issues.

One element addresses what would

happen if the crude oil was tran-

sported by rail and how it would af-

fect the agricultural community

which depends on the railroad to

move commodities. There could be

harvest delays that would affect the

prices of commodities. Mr. Simon

explained, they are working with a

firm in D.C. and he has been prom-

ised a first draft no later than Mon-

day morning. The absolute deadline

however, is close of business Mon-

day afternoon. He assured there

would not be any further obligation,

legal or otherwise. The purpose of

asking Minot to join the brief is to

add weight to the points they are try-

ing to make. They have concerns

about the ramifications of a shut-

down and they want to demonstrate

that they have the Hub Cities and

the largest oil-producing counties on

board as well as support from the

counties in which the pipeline

crosses. Mr. Lakefield asked Mr.

Simon to comment on their previous

conversations regarding cost and

contributions. Mr. Simon said, the

cost to develop the brief is $30,000

and the WDEA will pay for at least

half. They have requested partici-

pants contribute the other half which

equates to an amount not to exceed

$2,500. He said, when you consider

the shutdown would have a

multi-million effect on the state’s

economy, $2,500 is not a lot. Po-

drygula said he supports pipelines

and understands the impacts but

raised concerns about getting the

City of Minot involved. He said the

brief is very persuasive without in-

cluding Minot and he doesn’t believe

the City should be dragged into this.

He said, oil is important for the state

and for the country but he is not

comfortable signing Minot’s name to

it and feels pressured and rushed

into a decision. Mr. Simon stated,

Minot is not being dragged into any-

thing but they are already involved.

This will affect everyone in the state

and they are trying to make sure the

local impact is considered in the de-

cision. The State and Petroleum

Council prepared marvelous briefs

but looking back a few weeks, the

State submitted other amicus briefs

in support of a decision to keep the

pipeline in operation. They were also

done well but were ignored by the

judge. He said, if the Minot Council

is not comfortable making a financial

contribution, it is not a requirement

but they would like to put Minot in

the amicus brief in support of their

argument. Pitner said, from his per-

spective, they have no legal obliga-

tion, there is no financial contribution

required, they are simply being

asked does the shutdown effect

Minot economically, and it does.

Evans withdrew her motion. Po-

drygula withdrew the second. Evans

moved Podrygula seconded to post-

pone the issue until Monday morn-

ing when they have had an oppor-

tunity to read the amicus brief. After

brief discussion, a vote was taken

and carried by the following roll call

vote: Evans, Jantzer, Olson, Po-

drygula; nays: Pitner, Ross, Sipma.

Podrygula asked if a letter of support

could satisfy their request without

signing onto an amicus brief. Evans

responded by saying, a letter of sup-

port would not be added into the

record. It would have to be included

in the amicus brief along with all oth-

er secondary information. The Coun-

cil discussed a time for the Monday

meeting and decided to hold a spe-

cial Council meeting Monday at

10:00 am. There being no further

business, Evans moved Pitner

seconded and was carried to ad-

journ the meeting at 12:40 pm

APPROVED: Shaun Sipma, Mayor;

ATTEST: Kelly Matalka, City Clerk –

PURSUANT TO NDCC 40-01-09.1,

THESE MINUTES PUBLISHED

SUBJECT TO THE COUNCIL’S RE-

VIEW AND REVISION.

(July 29, 2020)

MINOT CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING

JULY 20, 2020 AT 10:00 A.M.

Members Present: Evans, Jantzer,

Olson, Pitner, Podrygula, Ross, Sip-

ma

Members Absent: None

Mayor Sipma presiding and led the

City Council in the Pledge of Allegi-

ance.

Ross moved Jantzer seconded to

approve the request from Geoff

Simon, Executive Director of the

WDEA, to include the City of Minot

as a supporter to the amicus brief

being submitted in response to the

shutdown of the Dakota Access

Pipeline. Mr. Simon provided addi-

tional information to the Council. He

said, a draft of the amicus brief was

emailed to the Council the previous

night. He reiterated the impacts of

increasing production costs if using

rail to transport oil. He said, the

WDEA wants to ensure the court ful-

ly appreciates the devastation it

would cause, on top of the economic

losses experienced due to the drop

in oil prices and the demand des-

truction caused by the pandemic. He

clarified, they are not taking sides in

the argument made by the Standing

Rock Tribes that the environmental

review was inadequate. They are

just asking the court not to shut

down the pipeline while additional

environmental reviews are conduct-

ed because there would be irrepar-

able damage to the economy. He

then stated, there would be no future

obligation on behalf of the City of

Minot, they are just putting their con-

cerns on record. He mentioned the

financial contribution that was dis-

cussed previously but said MADC

has offered to make the contribution

if requested. The Mayor then asked

for comments from Shane Goettle,

the City’s Special Counsel on Leg-

islative Lobbying. Mr. Goettle said

he is concerned about the appear-

ance of Minot compared to other

Hub Cities like Williston and Dickin-

son who have already sign off on the

amicus brief. How the City of Minot

reacts to this could affect Minot’s

standing within the Association and

could impact how we work with Hub

Cities. He reminded the Council,

they have come a long way since

Minot was designated a Hub City

and have worked to build a more ob-

jective formula-based approach for

Hub City funding. His concern would

be in what it looks like to the associ-

ation and how it transfers to the

legislators in those communities.

Minot receives funding from gross

production tax, as well as the state’s

share of flood control funding from

the Natural Resources Trust Fund

through the excise tax. If there is a

reduced amount of oil being pro-

duced in North Dakota, then there is

a subsequent reduction for available

funding. It also affects the case for

the Legacy Fund and long-term

financing for the local share of flood

protection. Tom Rafferty, represent-

ing the Minot Area Chamber of

Commerce, spoke in favor of sup-

porting the amicus brief. He pointed

out the Minot logo which exempli-

fies, Provide, Power, Protect,

through agriculture, energy and the

Air Force. Businesses are con-

cerned especially during the COVID

pandemic and they would like to get

the economy back to normal as

soon as possible. This shut down

would devastate Minot even worse

than it already is. Brekka Kramer,

representing MADC, also spoke in

support of signing on to the amicus

brief. She said, the mission of the

MADC is to facilitate business at-

traction, expansion, retention, and

advocacy to diversify and strengthen

the Minot area. One of their posi-

tions is that we are the gateway to

the Bakken and oil and gas is critical

to our area. She said they are there

to strongly urge the Council be a

part of the amicus brief. They provid-

ed resolutions of support from the

Board of Directors of the MADC and

Chamber of Commerce. She stated,

as Mr. Simon had mentioned, the

MADC would contribute financially

to this cause in the amount of

$2,500 if requested. She then said,

there is no point in shutting down the

pipeline since it is extremely unlikely

that an environmental statement will

compel owners to change any as-

pect of pipeline operations. Tawny

Trottier Cale, representing the ND

Human Rights Coalition, spoke in

opposition to the request. She

thanked the Mayor for calling the

meeting and holding an open dis-

cussion as she was unable to find

similar opportunities afforded to the

citizens of Watford City, Williston or

Dickinson regarding this issue. She

referenced the Alderman’s previous

comments stating they are being

pressured into supporting the brief.

She said, Minot is currently in a neu-

tral position but agreeing to add

Minot’s name decides which side of

a high-profile, globally recognized,

social issue they are taking. She

questioned if the citizens of Minot

are ready for the social and econom-

ic ramifications of that stance. She

quoted the WDEA’s recent

newsletter that included a statement

by Lynn Helms, the Director of the

Department of Mineral Resources,

which said it is too optimistic to be-

lieve crude oil demand would return

to pre-virus levels by this time next

year and the pandemic would likely

have a permanent impact on

demand. She stated, this is a

for-profit company expecting local

organizations and municipalities to

pay a portion of their legal fees to ar-

gue against a pipeline that has been

determined by the federal govern-

ment as unlawful. She asked the

Council to uphold the Mayor’s previ-

ous statement that Minot handles it-

self differently than most places

around the country, and to deny the

request. Chris Brown, a Minot

resident, said, the economic impact

relating to the Dakota Access Pipe-

line is not a neutral term. Agreeing

to the economic impact shows tacit

support for all aspects of the

pipeline’s contested development

and current operation. When the

Council and WDEA speaks about

community, the voices and lives of

Indigenous People are absent from

the conversation. People throughout

North Dakota fought to oppose the

Dakota Access Pipeline’s develop-

ment and their concerns were ig-

nored. He said Minot should stand

on the side of Indigenous commun-

ities and not on the side of oil and

gas corporations. The U.S. District

Judge has ordered a full environ-

mental review by the USACE citing

“serious gaps in crucial parts of the

Corps analysis.” He shared statistics

about leaks and historical data from

the Pipeline and Hazardous Material

Safety Administration. Annette Men-

num, a Minot resident and enrolled

member of the Turtle Mountain

Band of Chippewa, spoke against

the motion. She said, it was not long

ago, the reservation signed a no

fracking resolution because they

knew that one day the aquifers

would be more valuable than oil.

They make decisions in the best in-

terest od future generations. She

told the Council, if this is not their

fight, they should be prepared for

which side they choose. Olson ack-

nowledged the emails they received

over the weekend but said it seemed

like the Council is perceived to have

a lot more authority than they truly

do. They are not the judge and jury

and are just being asked if oil in-

come impacts our community, which

she said, it does. She stated, they

fought hard to achieve the status of

a Hub City because they believe

there is an impact on Minot. Losing

that income would have a negative

impact on the citizens of Minot and

would likely have an impact on

taxes. She clarified, she is not taking

sides, but is saying this will have a

negative impact on the City of Minot

so she encouraged the other Coun-

cil members to vote in favor of the

motion. Ross asked about the in-

come received through Hub Cities,

to which the Finance Director stated,

Minot received $4.8 million in 2019,

year-to-date for 2020 Minot has re-

ceived about $2 million and they are

forecasting about $4 million by the

end of the year. He stated, more im-

portantly, the money the City re-

ceives from the State Water Com-

mission supports the flood control

project. In the 2019-2021 biennium

the funding is about $186 million. It

comes from the Natural Resources

Trust Fund, funded by oil tax reve-

nue. Evans shared excerpts from

some of the emails received over

the weekend. Podrygula said, they

were asked for information and need

to focus on the economic impact the

shutdown would have on Minot. He

said, after reading the briefs, he no-

ticed that the State spoke on behalf

of the State but no one had men-

tioned the interests of local com-

munities and counties. The needs of

some local governments have not

been adequately recognized and it

should be brought to the attention of

the court. There is no acknowledge-

ment of other potential harms in-

cluding environmental and the rights

of local Tribal governments. He does

not see this as a global endorse-

ment or opposition but rather a very

technical legal issue in which they

are providing information. He shared

his disappointment that the issue

hasn’t been settled sooner. He said

he has strong feelings on the issue

but has to put the needs of the com-

munity before his own. He then

pointed out the difference between

signing on as a party to the brief and

providing information and they are

being asked to provide information.

He shared that he was impressed by

Ms. Cale, who spoke her Native

language to the Council. Because of

the changes in what they are being

asked to do he is willing to vote in

favor of accepting the brief. Pitner

listed the economic impact oil reve-

nue has had on numerous City pro-

jects. Those projects total about

26.5 mils of property tax the citizens

of Minot didn’t have to pay. There is

clearly a negative economic impact

to Minot if it is shutdown. Sipma

said, they have consistently support-

ed their partners and Minot is a

member of the WDEA as well as

other organizations such as MADC.

He then thanked MADC and their

Board for stepping forward and look-

ing at the economic development

component. He said, it is clear Minot

is a Hub City judging by the growth

in the community when oil took off.

He said, they also support other

partners, including Minot Air Force

Base, when they spoke on their

behalf during the legislative session.

He said he supports the motion be-

cause it has a significant impact on

the safety of the community through

flood control. Ross agreed, as

members of the WDEA they believe

in their mission. They belong to the

Association because there is

strength in numbers and this is an

opportunity for Minot to stand with

their partners. By voting against this

would send a message that the City

is not standing with them and sends

a message to legislators that could

be detrimental for years. They are

providing information to the court to

make an intelligent reasonable deci-

sion. A vote was taken on the above

motion and carried unanimously.

There being no further business,

Pitner moved Ross seconded and

was carried to adjourn the meeting

at 10:46 am.

APPROVED: Shaun Sipma, Mayor;

ATTEST: Kelly Matalka, City Clerk –

PURSUANT TO NDCC 40-01-09.1,

THESE MINUTES PUBLISHED

SUBJECT TO THE COUNCIL’S RE-

VIEW AND REVISION.

(July 29, 2020)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS

Probate No. 51-2020-PR-00121

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

WARD COUNTY, STATE OF

NORTH DAKOTA

In the Matter of the Estate of

Bruce H. Brooks, Deceased.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that

the undersigned has been appointed

personal representative of the above

estate. All persons having claims

against the said deceased are re-

quired to present their claims within

three months after the date of the

first publication or mailing of this no-

tice or said claims will be forever

barred. Claims must either be

presented to Chris A. Brooks, per-

sonal representative of the estate at

c/o Howard & Associates, 7 Third

St. SE, Suite 202, Minot, North

Dakota 58701-3916, or filed with the

Court.

Dated this 8th day of July, 2020

/s/Chris A. Brooks

Chris A. Brooks

1821 N. Eagle Road

Eagle, ID 83616

Judith E. Howard (ID 03482)

Howard & Associates

7 Third St. SE, Suite 202

Minot. ND 58701-3916

(701)852-5904

(July 15-22-29, 2020)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS

Probate No. 51-2020-PR-00129

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

WARD COUNTY, STATE OF

NORTH DAKOTA

In the Matter of the Estate of

ARLENE L. NELSON,

Deceased.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that

the undersigned has been appointed

personal representative of the above

estate. All persons having claims

against the said deceased are re-

quired to present their claims within

three months after the date of the

first publication or mailing of this no-

tice or said claims will be forever

barred. Claims must either be

presented to BRUE SWANSON,

Personal Representative of the

estate, at 2525 Elk Drive, P.O. Box

1000, Minot ND 58702-1000, or filed

with the Court.

Dated this 17th day of July, 2020.

/s/Brue Swanson

Brue Swanson

Brent M. Olson – #05593

PRINGLE & HERIGSTAD, P.C.

2525 Elk Drive

P.O. Box 1000

Minot, ND 58702-1000

bolson@pringlend.com

Attorneys for: Personal Representa-

tive

(July 22-29; August 5, 2020)

ORDER TERMINATING

PARENTAL RIGHTS

(Revised for Publication)

Civil No. 51-2020-JV-00065

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA,

COUNTY OF WARD, IN JUVENILE

COURT, NORTH CENTRAL

JUDICIAL DISTRICT

IN THE INTERST OF C.C., MINOR

CHILD

State of North Dakota,

Petitioner,

vs.

C.C., child,

Felecia Cockrell, mother

Respondents.

THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

TO THE ABOVE- NAMED

RESPONDENT, FELECIA

COCKRELL.

A petition to Terminate Parental

Rights of Felecia Cockrell, mother,

was heard by the Court on July 16,

2020. The Respondent parent,

Felecia Cockrell, was not present at

said hearing. That the Court found

based on the file and the testimony

and evidence that Felecia Cockrell,

mother, should be forever deprived

of all parental rights with reference

to C.C. Based on the foregoing the

Court entered an ORDER TO TER-

MINATE PARENTAL RIGHTS that

Felecia Cockrell, be and hereby

deprived of all parental rights with

reference to said child and the rela-

tionship of parent and child between

the child and the natural mother is

hereby forever terminated.

Dated at Minot, North Dakota this

17th day of July, 2020.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Connie S. Portscheller

Judicial Referee

(July 22-29; August 5, 2020)

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.

Firm General Contracted Demand

Service

Tariff

Case No. PU-20-335

NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR

HEARING

July 23, 2020

On July 6, 2020, Montana-Dakota

Utilities Co. (MDU) filed an applica-

tion for approval of modifications to

its Firm General Contracted

Demand Service Rate 74 and Gen-

eral Provisions Rate 100 Tariffs. The

Tariff modifications are intended to

clarify contract requirements for

Rate 74 and the applicability of the

Reservation Charge Rate 75 for

seasonal customers.

The issues to be considered in this

proceeding are:

1. Are the proposed changes rea-

sonable?

2. Is there other relevant information

the Commission should consider?

Persons desiring a hearing must file

a written request identifying their in-

terest in the proceeding and the rea-

sons for requesting a hearing. Com-

ments and requests for hearing must

be received by September 6, 2020.

If deemed appropriate, the Commis-

sion can determine the matter

without a hearing.

For more information contact the

Public Service Commission, State

Capitol, Bismarck, North Dakota

58505, 701-328-2400; or Relay

North Dakota, 1-800-366-6888 TTY.

If you require any auxiliary aids or

services, such as readers, signers,

or Braille materials, please notify the

Commission.

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Julie Fedorchak, Commissioner

Brian Kroshus, Chairman

Randy Christmann, Commissioner

(July 29, 2020)