I'll say what billgrr said about Republicans with edits, and in the form of a question, not a statement like his.
Is it because they're lazy Democrats?
Just speculatin' - don't burst a blood vessel.
0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
I am still waiting for Legend or one of the 5 who agreed with him on his post of the 27th @7:35 to back the statement with facts.
1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
The North Dakota Legislature is responsible for the redistricting process. If a plan is not agreed upon by the Legislature, a federal or state court may draw the lines. The North Dakota Constitution stipulates that the Senate must be composed of between 40 and 54 members. The House must be composed of between 80 and 180 members. Currently, there are 47 Senate members and 94 House members. A statutory provision provides that any census after 1999 must use the current 47 and 94 figures.
1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Early Bird, I guess I wasn't clear when I wrote that comment. I can see how my statement implied such. I was referring to the increase in residents which would justify redistricting. But I don't believe that a special session is needed. I am still waiting for Legend to compile the data that I requested.
Disgusted.. I think you hit the nail on the head, I see government expansion coming out of this session too. They will somehow add districts and reps without an election.
2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Oil impact? What oil impact?
1 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Identify for us the specific items that are not being addressed or are short of funding right now.
1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
On March 15, 2011, North Dakota received its local 2010 census data. The data was used to guide the state as it redrew state and local electoral districts. Although North Dakota experienced net growth of approximately 5%, a majority of rural districts lost population. Losses were especially significant in the state's northeast. These population shifts presented challenges for lawmakers as rural districts had to expand geographically to increase their population.
Ha,ha,ha,ha, Redistricting changes are directly related to population ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,Thats a good one .what do you have for your oncore.Goinpeace
3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Redistricting changes are directly related to population. A new district was set up in Fargo. Wonder how many new districts will be established in the western counties next. Population decreased north east of Minot. Property tax is not a reason for a special session. The voters decided they wanted to keep paying the tax. Talk to them.
2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
if a person shuts it down we have to go back to living in cabins and living off the land , milking your own cow and giving up a way of life, and we know that wont happen, so we have to be good stewarts with what we have.
Shut it all down and there will be no need for further allotments.
4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
I wish the oil producing counties would ban together and shut this thing down until all their financial needs are met. it would be so simple to do. especially in the spring during weight restrictions, etc.
5 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
animal, I understand your frustration, but we have many good hard working people in the state legislature. And then we have many people who vote for every government program that they can dream up. Judy Lee votes more democrat than most of the democrats and she is republican(RINO). Mark, A special session may be needed, but I find it somewhat suspect that the request for a special session did not come the legislators who live in the oil country, but from one from Fargo. How much money has been spent? Is the ongoing allotment insufficient? What specific needs are not being addressed without a special session? It was a legislator from Tioga who drafted the first bill, and that was changed somewhat to send more money to the eastern borders of the oil country. Ryan Taylor lost the eastern half of the state because of his hat. Lib Dems from Grand Forks and Fargo admitted as much. Of course, his whining about the big swing sets in all the yards in GF didn't help, I am sure.
3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Im sure the oil executives will continute to tell the state legislatures what to do without calling a special session
7 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
as soon as they open this up most of the money will end up in the east part of the state, if you people think it will go in your pocket some how you are foolish, that is what you want to happen but it wont happen that way. make smart decisions not emotional ones.
9 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
So with all the increased population we must also have a corresponding increase in district reps. or not? It seems like we just reduced the number of reps last election didn't we, they rezoned or changed something. I remember that Taylor had to run against a fellow district rep or come up with a different plan so his party put him in the election as a candidate for Governor. His party ended his hopes to be a career politician when they threw him under the Republican run bus.
6 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Yes but only because they have a run away going on in the Oil and Gas Division.
massive premium hikes coming in May for the world's greatest healthcare program "obamacare", and yet the govt wants the few that pay taxes to pay even more. the Pride of having all that citizen tax money held by the govt is supposed to make me proud i guess, but i'd feel even prouder if they'd let us have some of our own money back!
8 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
And get serious about addressing Property Taxes which are stealing the lifeblood from the elderly and the poor. North Dakota can do better my God with 6 Billion in the Bank and they act like Mizers with every penney, even forcing new Schools to be built on Property Tax.
20 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
301 4th St SE , Minot, ND 58703 | 701-857-1900