We have known this for a long time loco but why do libs like Veritas and Centerfield never say a word of disapproval? I think I can answer that myself.
1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
I think Matt made some really good points on that multiple user thingy some have going here on MDN.
willgrr, your suggestions, though earnestly given, I'm sure, will be placed in my "file 86" as there's no need for me to adhere to any of them.
Free speech for all, not just for willgrr
...and then vote "up" their own comments because they need to feel popular
What a loser someone would have to be to do that...
2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Don't you wish that once people got banned from this site, they couldn't come back with new usernames? Or only be allowed to post under one username instead of creating three or four to create the illusion of mass support?
My vote: "Both equally"
These polls really do a poor job of capturing the option that my opinions would cause me to support.
Not when there's a "right winger" to castigate. That's default mode, isn't it, centerish?
centerfold should scold him severely loco but she won't will she?
willgrr must have c/p'd that latest little diatribe on Sarah Palin, and with no credits either. Hmmm...
Isn't the topic Chris Christie? Or will any Republican target do? Especially a Republican woman target? Who can't fight back?
I've looked it over. It seems to copy some of the Bible, then add words of their prophet.
"Debate" for religious books? What would be the desired goal of the debate?
0 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
"...you are casting stones and judging the non believers of your Aesop's Fable book."
According to the religion of tolerance, isn't this a big no-no?
Perhaps some of this anti-religious fervor should be directed at devout Muslims and their sacred book. Will they accept an infidel's words and roll over to play dead, like any run-of-the-mill believer in God is supposed to?
Y'know, in the grand scheme of things, willgrr's viewpoint will end up not mattering, just like most humans' viewpoints. Fact...
1 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
And another thing... we should probably smoke more pot. Just sayin'...
2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Oh... and Benghazi... who cares. This is irrelevant Faux Newz. ..it happens. We should probably look a bit closer at our foreign policy to prevent such things in the future. We should probably not attack and occupy nations like Iraq.
Peace and Semper Fidelis...
4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Napoleon; another wiilgarrs aliases'. How many are you working here now? Doesn't matter for we know the fakir by now.
2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Napoleon.. You really have to keep up.. Garr knows exactly what its all about...
2 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Chris Christie thinks he'll be the next president . . .
5 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
I don't understand Landslide14's comment at all or is it just me? Jan-19-14 2:46 PM
4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Chris Christie thought that he would put himself on the comeback trail by going to Florida in raising lots of money. Instead, new scandal allegations followed Christie to the state, and sent him hiding from the public.
There is no escape for Christie. These scandals aren’t going away. If he thought that he would be able to flee to Florida and impress the donors, he was sorely wrong. Gov. Christie keeps trying to change the subject, while back in New Jersey his presidential ambitions keep edging closer and closer to oblivion.
The great irony is that Chris Christie is getting the mainstream media attention that he set himself up for. Democrats are already busy defining Christie for 2016. Chris Christie can’t run, and he can’t hide. His scandals will continue to follow him for the rest of his career.
Is that how you love your wife? You want her gay abortions sleeping around wekfare and food stamps? If its not what you want then you don't love her right?
Its only right you want for your country what you want for your wife...
Or do you have a double standard????Huh Garr????
2 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Kileery/..This individual demonstrates a complete lack of morals and is unwilling to face all the skeletons in her closet.
But the Conservatives are going to drag her skeltons out and drag them and her thru the press with relentlessness..
She will get everything she deserves and more and I am sure the Republicans will once again be the party of women haters..
So bring out the puke and lets see how she does.. If she lives that long.. You don't stress and carry 100 lbs around for very long before it kills you..
1 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
And you Garr want the half wit wife of a cheating husband who failed her job and let 4 people get killed in bangazhi.. Then she went into hiding, had a stroek, passed it off as the flu and came back with glasses to help her not see double.. then Siad they are Dead so what differance doe it make.
A women who has failed to tackle her weight and her medical problems.. a women who left a trail of dead people in her wake after white water.. and you want her to be the next prez.. The beech lies as much if not more then Obama. This country is fed with with the lying liberals..
This individual demonstrates a complete lack of morals and is unwilling to face all the skeletons in her closet.
OFCS, no one cares about Benghazi except Faux Newz Channel viewers. The rest of US live in reality...
5 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
When Obama LIES just blame Bush but the American people got hit in the pocketbook so NOW they are paying attention to the dumcoff who LIED and LIED and LIED to them..
3 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
hey folks Garr wants to compare dead Saudies on Bushes watch to dead American Ambassadors under Obamas leadership ..
I guess Garr is to ignorant to sort the apples and oranges in these killings.. hes defenseless against the Liar in the White House so he has to revert back to Bush.. Days gone by versus here and now ..but they cannot defend the Liar of the Year!!!!!
301 4th St SE , Minot, ND 58703 | 701-857-1900