Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Progress 2016 | Customer Service | Contact Us | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS

Has transporting N.D's crude oil by rail become too dangerous to allow?

  1. Yes
  2. No
  3. Undecided
sort: oldest | newest




Jan-10-14 6:28 PM

There are new tougher regulation for tank car being proposed. Job killing regulations. JOB KILLING REGULATIONS!!!

Oh, Wait. The regulations are being proposed by Senator Hoeven.(R) Never mind, false alarm.

3 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 1:41 PM

Veritas: Spot on!

3 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 1:37 PM

Most rail crashes r caused by bad wheels or track. The minot anhydrous spill was from a known bad joint. When you hear a moving clunk, clunk, clunk as a train goes by; it is probably a bad wheel. When the clunk is stationary; it is bad track or joint. The rail reduced car and track maintenance some years ago to maximize profits. These problems r all fixable. Just don't expect lynn helms or any other oil giddy puppet to fix it. PJ: casselton is the home of some nd politicians past and present. Some r pro-regulation on rail and oil--i expect good policy to come from this wreck and none 2 soon.

3 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 1:33 PM

Train composition could also be a factor in the explosions, crude doesn't explode unless ignited. I noticed all exploding trains included propane and ethanol tank cars, ship crude with grain, or something inert.

6 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 1:32 PM

I hear it was so cold the "socialist progressives" kept their hands in their own pockets. "Socialist Progressives" want the oil transported by rail figuring there is a higher likelihood of an accident than a pipeline. Then there is the manufactured "coal dust" problem. Nobody has ever seen "coal dust" blow off the trains but it must exist. Just like unicorns and "fairy dust"

7 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 12:37 PM

well i will say drill baby drill, just get more trains and move that stuff, or pump it, america i love this place.opportunity left and right

7 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 10:45 AM

Thanks for 10 disagrees, I just made $50.

3 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 10:44 AM

Sometimes Yes means No. Depends on how answer is calibrated.

ON etoV

2 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 10:17 AM

The only thing the emperor is truly concerned with is tourism! He and his family( including mother in law )have done more for increasing the tourism industry than any other person in American history! Spend spend spend while the rest of the country goes broke!

9 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 10:08 AM

Is it too dangerous for a ship to sail the ocean or is it worth the risk to deliver a tanker of oil to the New York harbor?

Remember the train derailment outside of Minot, ND that had a cargo of anhydrous ammonia?

Oil is not nearly as dangerous, nor as toxic.

Hazards exist all around us. Nuclear power plants that are damaged and melt down are here on earth. Nuclear arms, chemical weapons, there is a plethora of risks surrounding us all at all times.

Nor can it be stopped. Have to have all kinds of pre-cautions and safety systems, all in place, for humanity to continue to exist. You cannot ignore nuclear power plants. They must be maintained and must continue to generate power. China Syndrome is a real problem in Japan.

Live on earth is fraught with real dangers at all times anymore.

Trains hauling crude oil is a solution, not a problem. If there were less demand for oil, the BNSF wouldn't be hauling it all of the time.

10 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 9:08 AM

Obama couldn't fix a*****thing......he has already let the bad guys back in Iraq.

12 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 9:08 AM

Something happen and the investigation will point what the problem was. Somebody is at fault. It's not all BNSF here in North Dakota. It takes an industry to create oil and more than BNSF who is involved.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 9:06 AM

he he he he he sameole

5 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 8:57 AM

Like PredJudice14, I am torn between 'yes' or 'no'.....if I say yes, my fellow Democrat Warren Buffett cannot build on his super-super rich wealth, and if I say no and the pipeline gets built, then I am not protecting my Mother Earth...

I just am not at peas with myself....

6 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 8:30 AM

oblamer will get right on that as soon as He and moochelle get back from their latest multi million dollar vacation in hawaii.

11 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 8:15 AM

Interesting that Obama has been asked to do something about the safety of oil transportation by rail because of this last train derailment AND one in Canada last year..

Seems some of his loyal jones followers think he should pass laws that would fix it here AND in Canada..

His loyal Jones followers think he can now decide what laws Canada should have..

10 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 6:48 AM

Man Made Problem This Can be Fixed

15 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-10-14 1:15 AM

Big Oil Is Dangerous

Vote NO

4 Agrees | 13 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 18 of 18 comments

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
Remember my email address.


I am looking for:
News, Blogs & Events Web