Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Progress 2016 | Customer Service | Contact Us | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

If you were a teacher and your school district allowed it, would you carry a gun with you to school?

  1. Yes
  2. No
 
 
 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(37)

disgusted

Apr-09-13 7:44 AM

After your first comment, I wouldn't want you to carry either.

7 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

EarlyBird

Apr-09-13 8:19 AM

Personally, if it were me the gun would be concealed and no one but me and the required personal would know I had it. I understand how long death lasts and wish that for no one.

5 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

EarlyBird

Apr-09-13 8:48 AM

Rugby reader, don't forget it's the criminals not the rest of us who assault people. What would you protect yourself with if confronted by a person with a gun who intends to do serious harm to you. How about some sort of sleeping gas that could quickly and harmlessly put everyone at the school asleep until we could get the crazy ones into custody. This is just as crazy so feel free to laugh.

4 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

animal

Apr-09-13 9:13 AM

yes!! On a volunteer basis,with proper training and extra pay for the ones that decide to take that responsibility.Also EMT training for all teachers should be mandatory. Also teachers should be allowed to discipline students, without parents interfering, like they did 30 years ago! These parents that don't believe in discipline are the ones that are to blame for these killings, not the guns!!!

4 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

animal

Apr-09-13 9:16 AM

Rugbyreader take a deep breath,splash some cold water on your face and see if you can grasp reality for just a moment!

6 Agrees | 9 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TheDiogenist

Apr-09-13 11:36 AM

"...it's the criminals not the rest of us who assault people."

Not specifically directing this at Early, but that pretty much sums up the argument. At what point does one of the 'rest of us' become criminal? Obviously, when they assault someone.

Even today, the monsters seem due on Maple Street. (For those of you who might remember your Rod Serling...)

4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ZRider

Apr-09-13 12:56 PM

Yes, lets fill schools with guns and see how many students and teachers end up dying.

7 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

muleskinner

Apr-09-13 2:14 PM

Well, if I were a student at a school that had a teacher who carried a gun, I'd carry a gun to school for my own protection.

You never know when one of those teachers with a gun might go postal at the school.

Best not to take any chances.

4 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

billldoesntgetit

Apr-09-13 4:10 PM

minireader I think the guy wanted to commit suicide by cop..

Happens alot. people who don't have the guts to kill themselves but want to die pull a gun (many times toy) on a cop and get themselves killed.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

EarlyBird

Apr-09-13 4:11 PM

Hahaha maybe sleeping gas was a good idea. I wasn't insinuating being safe is crazy by the way.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

billldoesntgetit

Apr-09-13 4:12 PM

No Bill we think mini is just fine and playing with a full deck and has all his marbles..but you Bill? Not so much!!!

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

billldoesntgetit

Apr-09-13 4:14 PM

zrider I take it you prefer the Sandy Hook method where no one has a gun but the shooter right?

If every teacher was armed no one would be coming in to kill people.

How many idiots do you see attacking the police stations?

I rest my case!!!

5 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

disgusted

Apr-09-13 8:11 PM

didn't know we were counting, but my comment rec'd 7 ;-)

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Heisenberg

Apr-09-13 8:44 PM

Weigh the options: How many school shootings have there been that we could reasonably expect to have been prevented by a teacher with a gun, versus how many school shootings could be caused by an angry student managing to get a hold of a teacher's gun.

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TheDiogenist

Apr-09-13 9:30 PM

Building on Heisenberg's comment, the dangers wouldn't necessarily be limited to an angry student's obtaining of a teacher/deputy/loosely-organised-citizen-soldier's weapon either; any number of accidents, misfortunes, or simple acts of negligence could result that would far outweigh any safety the weapons might be intended to provide. Plus it's an unreasonable assumption that most any of these lay figures would react appropriately in a worst-case scenario. Many ranking police officials have come forward in the past few months with the professional opinion that multiple armed persons in such a situation would unnecessarily complicate matters and possibly delay police response.

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TheDiogenist

Apr-09-13 9:42 PM

And considering for a moment the general motivations for many (if not most) teachers, it is a terrible lot to expect of them their ability to shoot with intent to kill a student (i.e. child, gun or no), who they probably know and possibly know quite well. At least some of the time (more so than instances of vigilantism, in any case) these adults are able to talk the student down or otherwise prevent further carnage.

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

billldoesntgetit

Apr-09-13 10:37 PM

How many gunman would want to come in shooting at a fully armed school?

How many gunman have you see come in and start shooting up a police station.

These guys may be mentally ill but they also for the most part can figure the odds against them.

Why did the Colorado gunman pick the theater that said no firearms allowed?

geeez folks common sense please...

3 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TheDiogenist

Apr-09-13 11:05 PM

Sort of silly, BGDGI, when you consider Texas police are still looking for the person or persons who shot a lawyer right outside of a courthouse. Or that on 5 April an officer was shot and killed inside the Jackson, MS, police headquarters.

...which is not to in any way give your argument an undue sense of weight or practicability. Because following your line of thought, once every school was armed to the teeth these 'gunmen' would simply pick other non-armed targets. The cycle would continue until virtually everyone would be armed at all times. What you're suggesting as a solution to gun violence is a broken society which mirrors Mogadishu at its worst moments, or a bad day in the Lebanon. It's utter nonsense.

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

disgusted

Apr-10-13 4:13 AM

There are schools in the Fargo districts that have had gun protection for several years.

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

EarlyBird

Apr-10-13 8:25 AM

Lets just hope the criminals don't start to use poison like they did back in the 70-80's. Remember when people were dying from tampered food and medicine? If you forgot maybe you remember razor blades and poison for Halloween. In a contest of violence the most violent contender will surely win.

4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TheDiogenist

Apr-10-13 10:55 AM

Perhaps inadvertently, I think Early has a finger on the pulse of the thing. Razor blades and foodstuff tampering - like the "HIV pins" which scared people off from public phones a couple decades ago - are both examples of urban myth or overblown anomalies, largely the product of the media playing off people's boundless love of worry. School shootings, while horrific, are in and of themselves rare and unlikely. However, they condense and highlight broader flaws in the culture. Focusing entirely on any one particular element of these flaws has little chance of producing an effective or meaningful sort of improvement.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

EarlyBird

Apr-10-13 1:29 PM

Hi D. You are incorrect to think I inadvertently thought and wrote my opinion. That is my true opinion and you are welcome to use it as yours. I am not young and do have a pretty good memory yet.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

TheDiogenist

Apr-10-13 2:08 PM

E, I was simply pointing out that your opinion, while being factually incorrect, still highlighted rather well the frame of mind which has mired both sides of this 'gun debate' in America. In arguing over the ridiculous, Americans essentially are forgetting to have any meaningful sort of discussion (thus, the mire). And while you may remember poison, blades, etc, you are mistaken in thinking (then or now) that it was ever anything more substantial than hype or mild hysteria. Which happens, and is something we're generally all drawn into from time to time. But in this case I'm speaking with the benefits of hindsight and documentation at our disposal that show these things were largely invented/fictional and long since debunked as such.

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

EarlyBird

Apr-10-13 2:51 PM

D. Sorry but i was living in LA, CA when that stuff was going on and yes it was happening. But you are correct about the media always trying to leverage everything. You have a good mind, almost Priestly.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

EarlyBird

Apr-10-13 2:53 PM

Mr. D, Many stores put in cameras back then and we watched quite a few attempts to poison groceries and candy. Thankfully the cameras don't lie and the trend subsided to nearly nothing after people were justly punished for their deadly actions.

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 37 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web