Kids speak against smoking in cars
By Gwen Bristol, CorrespondentBISMARCK The House Finance and Taxation Committee asked hard questions Thursday of proponents of Senate Bill 2070, a bill that would make smoking in cars with children present illegal.
Among the questions were why the bill was limited to cars instead of including homes as well, how the bill could be enforced if it becomes law and why the age of 16 was selected as the cutoff age for the bill.
Austin Anderson, a seventh-grade student from Williston Middle School, fielded the age question, saying that 16-year-olds are fairly independent and many of them drive on their own.
"The higher the age limit, the more kids we are protecting," he said.
Like the Chokecherry Bill of last session, this bill was initiated by a group of students from Williston under the direction of Nancy Selby, a sixth-grade teacher at Rickard Elementary School. Anderson was joined by several classmates from the middle school as well as legislators in presenting testimony for the bill.
"As a young person in a car, you don't have an option," said Rep. Patrick Hatlestad, R-Williston. "There should be someone to speak for them, in this case, the Legislature."
Anderson said there are 4,000 chemicals in a single cigarette. He also said breathing cigarette smoke results in more missed school days and lower immune system functioning.
"It isn't worth dying or hurting someone else because of smoking," he said.
Classmate Samantha Miller said second-hand smoke has been correlated with increased incidences of sudden infant death syndrome, asthma, bronchitis and pneumonia. Keely Kleven spoke against the harmful effects of particulates from smoke.
"We are happy to speak for children who cannot speak for themselves," she said.
When asked why the bill addresses only smoking in cars, she said, "We decided this would be the best place to start."
Testimony by Dennis Cooley, a professor of philosophy and ethics at North Dakota State University, said because cars are small, enclosed areas they could be regarded as a special circumstance.
In answering a question from Rep. Dan Ruby, R-Minot, Cooley said enforcing the bill if it became law wouldn't be much different than enforcing the drinking laws the state has now. A law enforcement officer would have to see a person smoking in a car with children present in order for it to count as a violation.
Hailey Bendixson, also of Williston Middle School, said four states have already passed similar laws and many others have tried it or are working on it.
"We hope we can follow and be the fifth state to pass the bill," she said.
Sandra Miller, a registered nurse and a parent from Williston, also spoke for the bill.
"Smoking is a choice, not a right, and what about the rights of infants and children?" she said.
"The people in the cars are captive people," said Sen. Stan Lyson, R-Williston, in a separate conversation. "We've got to do what we can to protect them."
Also speaking for the bill were Rep. Gary Sukut, R-Williston, and Rep. Joyce Kingsbury, R-Grafton.
In spite of the hard questions, no one spoke against the bill.
It previously passed the Senate on Feb. 2 by a vote of 35 to 10 with no amendments.
|
MichaelJMcFadden
|
|
|---|---|
|
03-14-09 11:55 PM
|
The two comments below this provide a very good example of why this would be a BAD law. No normal parents drive around smoking in cars with the windows all rolled up with kids. Once the windows are opened even a small reasonable amount the smoke dissipates faster than it would in their homes... the kids would not be harmed. Meanwhile, people like the posters below might start swerving around the road trying to read license plate numbers and argue with police about swooping in with a SWAT team, and cause an accident that could immediately kill innocent adults AND children. - . - . - Michael J. McFadden, Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"
|
|
Momof3girls
|
|
|
03-13-09 11:13 AM
|
I've seen a police officer pull right up next to a car in front of me that had a child CLIBMING all over inside and the parent is talking on their cell phone and smoking. The cop didnt even look over! - I really don't see how this is going to change.
|
|
CanOurVoicesBeHeard
|
|
|
03-13-09 7:31 AM
|
On our way from Minot to Bismarck we saw 2 children not in their seatbelts and the mother was smoking and talking on a cellphone. We wanted to take a picture and post it in the newspaper. Can she be prosecuted if a public civilian takes the picture for proof? Or how about driving around in Minot and we see a newborn in the carseat while the mother has all the windows rolled up and she is smoking? The cops are never around to catch these things. Maybe we should be posting their pictures in newspapers as bad examples and maybe they will stop.
|




