Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Contact Us | Routes Available | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Proposal by EPA unrealistic

June 5, 2014

Spring is not a good time for farmers and ranchers in North Dakota to be hit with the Environmental Protection Agency’s new proposed rule for the Clean Water Act, which is nearly 400 pages long....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(8)

Peeweepeterson

Jun-09-14 11:31 AM

Why don't do things as a country because they are easy, we do things because they are hard - JFK.

If they can put a man on the moon, then they can hit the EPA marks. Of course, Chev can't even make a bumper that will last 5000 miles, so maybe I'll eat crow.......

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

JackAaah

Jun-09-14 8:34 AM

For sure, HAHA-InTheHead....I feel we all must believe 'the majority of the scientists'....I feel I don't understand why all scientists don't move forword and get on board with us on global warming....I feel we will have to go get that irrefutable scientific proof ( believe it's stored with the WMD's, Mark'sHigh)and get it to these holdout scientists...

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Jun-09-14 8:29 AM

Science deniers...nice phrase, that.

But not all are little sheep to be driven around by the climate change con artists, are they?

"There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth's atmosphere over the past 100 years," said (Greenpeace co-founder Patrick) Moore, who was testifying before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee's Subcommittee on Oversight.

"If there were such a proof, it would be written down for all to see. No actual proof, as it is understood in science, exists."

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

locomotive

Jun-09-14 8:23 AM

"But climate change, which the Republic party says is a hoax, is causing more of them with more frequency and intensity."

This is, of course, a very speculative, yet sincerely held opinion.

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

JackAaah

Jun-08-14 7:49 PM

I know, HAHA-InTheHead....I, too, do believe all that Ms.NBC tells me....I too wish we were back to the times when we had, well, maybe one tornado a decade...this dang global warming will be the end of us...

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marvin51

Jun-08-14 7:24 AM

Doesn't matter to Minot, the State Water Commission declared the Mouse is navigable so the EPA has jurisdiction with or without any new rule.

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

JackAaah

Jun-06-14 3:19 PM

I feel we could go back to the days of absolutely NO tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, droughts, and wildfires...if we can justa fight those Republics, and justa let the EPA do what it wants...when it wants...that I feel...

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

MyBadHairDayIsObamasFault

Jun-05-14 6:42 PM

"Proposal by EPA unrealistic"

So, is it "realistic" to deny climate change and just allow more and more catastrophic weather events to destroy more and more lives? Will it be "realistic" when all the coastal cities have 10 feet of water in the streets??

Maybe some of you right wing economic geniuses can tell us how all these tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, droughts, and wildfires affect our economy???

1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 8 of 8 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web