×

Compromise should be goal in right of way debate

Two opposing sides have carved out intractable positions when it comes to the contentious rural Ward County right of way issue.

On one hand, farmers feel the county policy is a land grab – yet another example of insensitive, imperial rule by a body with precious little concern for rural and agriculture interests.

On the other hand, the Ward County Commission majority points to the law on the books and responds to agitated rural taxpayers as if farmers are toting torches and pitchforks.

Perhaps a compromise is in order. At a planning commission meeting this week, Ward County Commissioner Shelly Weppler seemed to signal that she at least is open to adjusting the law, while the commission itself supported change in moving the issue ahead for consideration. Hopefully this indicates that the county commission might begin to moderate its collective position.

Compromise could be a hard sell. Rural residents’ connection to their land is time-honored and their patience often limited when it comes to interference with the cornerstone principle of property rights. Meanwhile, the county commission’s collective arrogance and condescending tone to any who dare question its machinations positions the county in a corner from where compromise is a challenge.

Yet, compromise is the best possible solution, a compromise found by dialogue and understanding. It’s a tall order for Ward County these days. However, it remains the right thing to do.

Newsletter

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)
Are you a paying subscriber to the newspaper? *
   

Starting at $4.62/week.

Subscribe Today